Asunto: Questions & Answers

I sure hope there will be some new stats concerning PP and PK with the promised updates ...

You know what this mean ?
We can easily calculate what is the influence for a center/winger in a line ! We can see how important is experience and chemistry over players' performance...

I don't think there will be PP/PK stats !

Well, don't you think that it is easy to do it right now? Just test it on friendly game

PK lines means -1 winger or -1 center. If you select an entire line from match to play as a PK (except one player), you'll see exactly he's influence over that line (number of pucks for offence, for shooting, or even for defence) !

I had a tiresome week, can you be more explicit with what have you said, please !

Ok, I ment mainly PP-lines. Just put to normal line 2 centers to attack with winger or center/winger to defender you'll see the stars.

So...

I expect to be able to see how well my pp and pk play just like my other lines. Its not as if i close my eyes while my special teams are on the ice.

I would also like to see faceoffs per centre etc (if its even calculated that way) and other things like that.

As far as I know, faceoffs are not implemented. I had a NC match against a NoName, where I had less more faceoffs won, even if my centers are over 70 on teq.

I have experienced similar issues.

One question: how many money wins the user who has a player in the NT? Thanks.

It depends on the game attendance. Yesterday it was $70,000

Ok. Thanks themightyoil

I'm not sure if this is a bug because the Guide doesn't say much about chemistry. From the start of the season chemistry of my reserve team players didn't rise, and even reserve goalie's experience didn't rise, even though they play as much as 4 friendlies per week. After the game it rises, say, to 7 and then next day it drops to 6. Is that normal or is it a bug?

I don't know if this is the correct place to write, but here it goes.
The relationship between the size of the arena (or attendance) and the level of facilities seems dispoportionate. The biggest clubs are close to having top level traininggrounds etc (or at least lvl. 13) while their arena-capacity is 8-15% of the maximum. Why isn't maintanence bankrupting more clubs?
I think sponsor pay should be reduced, while the price per attendance should be increased. Average attendance should influence sponsorshipsize.
Right now I think it is a waste of money increasing your stadium, and it shouldn't be.

Wait a bit until I develop my recently trashed maintenance center
I think lot of us will stop at 13th level of anything here. So, in order to get to 14th and 15th, Arena upgrade will be a must.

Not really. The way sponsorship increase, and with youth draft and player transfer, it's quite easy to get to lvl. 14 and 15 without a large arena, and that's sad